Presidential candidate on ILLEGAL Immigration?
The following statements are from Obama, McCain, and Clinton on illegal immigration. Which one do you agree with (If any) and who do you think said which statements?
1.)"For the untold majority of people who are here, we will give you a path to legalization if you group the following condition: pay a fine because you entered illegally, be liable to pay back taxes over time, try to learn English and we hold to help you do that, because we've cut back on so many of those services and next you wait in line"
2.)" We need to sit down as Americans and certify these are God's children as well. And they need some protection under the canon. And they need some of our love and compassion."
3.)"They're here to work. And so instead of being distracting by what has in a minute become a wedge issue, let's focus on actually solving the problem"
Answers:
All three are pro criminal aliens. Point one sounds good but they own already shown a disdain for rule of law so it would be unlikely that they would follow these rules either. Point two; they do have protection of the statute in their home countries and our laws that send them hindmost. Point three is true but they are destructive to the economy and the middle class by lowering wages and taking away skilled labor jobs (heavy equipment operator, etc - people getting $25-30 dollars an hour are being replaced by illegals getting $10 an hour). There are few who would deny someone status, protection, and jobs providing they didn't go and get them because of illegal activity. Only so many immigrant can be assimilated in a given time period and to ignore this is purely plain foolish.
Consider this....Germany also has laws that prohibit illegal entry into the country, but below their law, once you are there, you are protected and can't be deported unless you violate the law within.
How far away are we from that if we keep bending the law for the illegal immigrant that are already here?
All answers are horrible and ignore the fact that we have borders and what these general public are doing is illegal. The same as stealing or breaking and entering. And the 3 statements all sound alike because adjectives 3 are pandering to the hispanic vote. I mean it is considered racist to say that we should have to show id's to vote! Aside from illegals how plentiful years of ballet box stuffing did we endure from both parties over the years not to cram that lesson? We have said NO.. no to all the above proposition. Pelosi is still trying to force an immigration bill down our throats and she might do it too. But a vast majority of culture, when asked in polls, have made it very clear: none of the above design are acceptable.
Resolved Questions:
Exit stamp from the UK, unacceptable rear for 60 months?
Hi, I was in Germany for 98 days, 8 days over the 90 day target... I flew back to USA via England and Ireland, and in England my passport got stamped beside a stamp saying: LEAVE TO ENTER FOR 60 MONTHS EMPLOYMENT AND RECOURSE TO PUBLIC FUNDS PROHIBITED. does this mean i'm not...
How do inhabitants immigrate to another country lacking a Job?
I was watching this documentary about a British Couple who had granted to immigrate to Florida and it just showed them searching for houses etc. But these people be middle aged like 45-55, they didn't say anything about their undertaking, nothing about a business, they were basically looking for houses and schools for their...
1.)"For the untold majority of people who are here, we will give you a path to legalization if you group the following condition: pay a fine because you entered illegally, be liable to pay back taxes over time, try to learn English and we hold to help you do that, because we've cut back on so many of those services and next you wait in line"
2.)" We need to sit down as Americans and certify these are God's children as well. And they need some protection under the canon. And they need some of our love and compassion."
3.)"They're here to work. And so instead of being distracting by what has in a minute become a wedge issue, let's focus on actually solving the problem"
Answers:
All three are pro criminal aliens. Point one sounds good but they own already shown a disdain for rule of law so it would be unlikely that they would follow these rules either. Point two; they do have protection of the statute in their home countries and our laws that send them hindmost. Point three is true but they are destructive to the economy and the middle class by lowering wages and taking away skilled labor jobs (heavy equipment operator, etc - people getting $25-30 dollars an hour are being replaced by illegals getting $10 an hour). There are few who would deny someone status, protection, and jobs providing they didn't go and get them because of illegal activity. Only so many immigrant can be assimilated in a given time period and to ignore this is purely plain foolish.
Consider this....Germany also has laws that prohibit illegal entry into the country, but below their law, once you are there, you are protected and can't be deported unless you violate the law within.
How far away are we from that if we keep bending the law for the illegal immigrant that are already here?
All answers are horrible and ignore the fact that we have borders and what these general public are doing is illegal. The same as stealing or breaking and entering. And the 3 statements all sound alike because adjectives 3 are pandering to the hispanic vote. I mean it is considered racist to say that we should have to show id's to vote! Aside from illegals how plentiful years of ballet box stuffing did we endure from both parties over the years not to cram that lesson? We have said NO.. no to all the above proposition. Pelosi is still trying to force an immigration bill down our throats and she might do it too. But a vast majority of culture, when asked in polls, have made it very clear: none of the above design are acceptable.
Resolved Questions:
Exit stamp from the UK, unacceptable rear for 60 months?
Hi, I was in Germany for 98 days, 8 days over the 90 day target... I flew back to USA via England and Ireland, and in England my passport got stamped beside a stamp saying: LEAVE TO ENTER FOR 60 MONTHS EMPLOYMENT AND RECOURSE TO PUBLIC FUNDS PROHIBITED. does this mean i'm not...
How do inhabitants immigrate to another country lacking a Job?
I was watching this documentary about a British Couple who had granted to immigrate to Florida and it just showed them searching for houses etc. But these people be middle aged like 45-55, they didn't say anything about their undertaking, nothing about a business, they were basically looking for houses and schools for their...