Does protectionism really work to control the iffy immigration problem?

Illegal immigration is a major problem. There are reportedly over ten million illegal immigrants within the United States and it's a growing number. However, protectionism, ie protecting our borders and deporting immigrants has not worked. Besides, will we ever have the man power to in safe hands the borders? Consider the other national security issues this country faces. I think allowing wrong immigrants to truly assimilate into this country by allowing them to have some of the rights as well as responsibilites allowed immigrants and citizens share rather than allowing them to hide underneath false identifications and reap the benefits from a system they are not fairly contributing into may save this country. There are reportedly billions of dollars being sent rear legs to countries of origin instead of money being put back into our discount. In recent past, banks like BOA thought they be smarter than most and could make profit from the untapped and growing illegal immigrant population. I don't know if it really worked. But it poses the question, will giving prohibited immigrants rights in exchange for their identification and enforce them to contribute into the systems they are unfairly benefiting from work to bring these people out of hiding and prevent them from unlawful behavior and running away from responsibilities? As an employer and consumer, you may choose to ignore the issue b/c you are addicted to the low cost of labor and services. As a above-board, civic minded taxpayer with much to lose, you see the public systems deteriorating and becoming overwhelmed. You may even have suffered from personal loss as a direct result of an illegal alien breaking the decree. I'd like to know what people think? Will protectionism work to nullify this problem or will giving them rights contained by exchange for their fair contributions into our systems help to take the burden past its sell-by date of the rest of us? Political parties on both sides have already realized they enjoy to give them rights to prevent illegal aliens from going underground and giving them opportunities to flee. By giving them rights, you lug away their anonimity and make it harder for them to run away, hide, and create other aliases.
Answers:   
First look at when illegal immigration became an invasion. About 20 years ago. What happened to start this invasion? Mx changed? No it's impossible to tell apart it's always been. Did something change surrounded by America? Birthright citizenship has been (wrongly) granted since 1869 when the 14th amendment was ratify. Women came gave birth and then go home. 20 years ago they no longer went home. They stayed and more and more started coming and more and more starting having babies. As medicine advanced babies born preterm are surviving, some next to serious developmental problems. Women who do not get prenatal care are prone to early births. These babies, because they be born here, were evaluated by Drs. and these problems were identified and all of a sudden the infant is on SSI getting Physical therapy, food assistance, housing assistance, WIC, and free health care.
And you hold groups like LaRaza, Derechos Humanos as well as TV and radio stations in spanish ratification this info along to all their fellow hispanics. "Your baby is an American and the American gov will give you adjectives kinds of free stuff". That's what started it. And taking away all explicitly what will end it.
Most illegals from important, and south america came to the U.S. to send money back to their family in their home countries. Also most illegals have no real desire to become true U.S. citizens. If they do want citizenship, more habitually than not all they are really becoming is hyphenated Americans, and a hyphenated American is a divided American, and not an American at all.
Teddy Roosevelt said it best " We have room for but one flag, the American flag, we enjoy room for but one language, the english language, and we have room for but one loyalty, and i.e. a loyalty to the American people.
To answer your question, I guess we really do not know. As I would not consider that it have failed in the past. I would read out that it has never been implemented! The facts are that our law have not been enforced for many years and our Government have taken a blind eye attitude to this problem. That needs to stop and we need to force our Government to do its job and i.e. to protect its Citizens from foreign threats. 60,000 American Citizens killed by illegal aliens over the last 7 years! Over 1 million sexual assaults committed by risky aliens! Almost 400 billion hard earned tax payer dollars drained from the American citizens respectively and every year. This is far to high a price to pay for this issue and it must stop now! There are frequent things we can do that have not been done and none of it involve Amnesty or the acception of people that would trample on our Good Country!
By doing so what class of message do we send?
Our laws here in America do not thing? enough people break the law and we'll stop enforce it?
What we need to do is pull the business's license of any company that hires illegals along with fines and tricky prison sentences I think that would be a good deterrent. I'd also like to see 100% of a federal funds be taken away from every state that considers itself a risk-free haven for illegals.

Where you and I disagree.
I believe breaking into our country & stealing jobs is wrong no matter how many society do it.
I have one question for you. If you want to allow the illegals to hold rights and be able to stay in the united states, after will you pay me back the thousands of dollars I have spent getting my spouse to be capable of live in the united states legally?

The simple certainty is these people have broken the law and entail to be punished, not rewarded. True, you will not catch them all.

If you started going after the employers who demur to get their employees work visas to be able to work within the united states legally, they would stop coming here. No jobs, no incentives.


Resolved Questions:
My application for PR visa of Canada be refuse contained by April,2008 for short of only just 2 points. Is Appeal possible?
I had applied for PR visa of Canada in Sept. 2002. Decision came contained by Apr. 2008. Almost six years. I had learnt French ( 2 levels, respectively of 150 hours ) at Alliance Francaise, Ahmedabad but did not take TEF. (one like...

10644-11.html